We MUST talk about: Citation Generators
Fact #1: Our school recognizes Purdue OWL as an excellent authority on citation style and writing.
Fact #2: Our school has adopted NoodleTools as the citation generation tool that we will use.
Fact #3: Our students sometimes use EasyBib anyway to generate citations, preferring the URL feature.
This prompted me to compare:
Here is how Purdue OWL instructs users to cite a Page on a Web Site:
For an individual page on a Web site, list the author or alias if known, followed by the information covered above for entire Web sites. Remember to use n.p. if no publisher name is available and n.d. if no publishing date is given.
“How to Make Vegetarian Chili.” eHow. Demand Media, n.d. Web. 24 Feb. 2009.
Here is how Noodletools generates a citation for a Web Page (using manual cell editing): note: the second and third lines were indented by NoodleTools, however I lost that formatting in WordPress.
Gafar, Amin. “What is Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome?” Getting Pregnant.
BabyCentre, Jan. 2012. Web. 7 May 2015. <http://www.babycentre.co.uk/
Here is how EasyBib generates a citation for a Web Page (using manual cell editing):
Gafar, Amin. “What Is Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome?” Getting Pregnant. BabyCentre, Jan. 2012. Web. 07 May 2015.
Here is how EasyBib generates a citation for a Web Page using the URL and not editing manually:
“What Is Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome?” BabyCentre. N.p., n.d. Web. 07 May 2015.
- NoodleTools does not offer the ability to drop the URL during the generation of the citation where EasyBib offers the option at that time. (Note: NoodleTools does allow you to drop the URL when you choose to print the bibliography using formatting options.)
- NoodleTools formats the citation with proper indenting where EasyBib does not. (Note: I lose that indentation in WordPress! It truly does indent properly and EasyBib currently does not.)
- NoodleTools drops the double digits for the date formatting (as modeled in Purdue OWL) where the number is under 10; EasyBib does not.
- EasyBib URL citation generator (without manual edit) takes the publisher and calls it the website title or else it tends to duplicate the article title and website title (making the title appear twice).
- EasyBib URL citation generator (without manual edit) never seems to identify a publisher and has a hard time identifying a date. This prompts students to have N.p., n.d. populating their entire Works Cited if they do not intervene.
- EasyBib does succeed in the copy/paste feature of an Article Title or Website Title, where it converts lower case titles to become upper case titles, according to MLA guidelines. NoodleTools does not (the student must recognize that they have pasted a title without proper MLA capitalization and change it themselves – NoodleTools throws an alert notice on the screen, however, I find my students have the tendency to ignore the alert.)
- Retain NoodleTools as only citation generator “allowed”
- Implement NoodleTools free version at middle school and elementary buildings (if using generators)
- Recognize that students will use EasyBib anyway and teach them what happens (go over Notes) during instruction.
- Instruct teachers of the differences between the results using both generators so that they can look for areas of trouble and help students identify and avoid the common pitfalls.
- Require students to send teachers their works cited/outlines through the NoodleTools email function
Based upon feedback from students and staff and in order to align our slideshow to our rubric, I have recently made major changes to our Annotated Bibliography slideshow. Hopefully it is now perfect???? (not sure!)